Sep 14, 2009

Illegal copy of the Oregon Attorney General's Public Records and Meetings Manual

Update: See here for more "copyrighted" law manuals from the Oregon DOJ, and here for a nice clean compact OCR'd pdf of the "Oregon Attorney General's Public Records and Meetings Manual" all courtesy of Carl Malamud at public.resource.org.

9/14/2009:
Every 2 years the Oregon DOJ publishes the "Oregon Attorney General's Public Records and Meetings Manual". Essential reading for people trying to use their right to get public records from Oregon government agencies. The DOJ has been trying to keep me from redistributing this manual, on the grounds that they own the copyright to it.

Trying to use copyright law to keep the public from getting information about how to get public records strikes me as wrong, so I've posted the manual online at my official UO faculty website. As the email below explains, I am posting this despite the fact that the AG's office has explicitly warned me not to redistribute this manual.

So, you can go here and pay the DOJ $25 for the dead-tree version, or download my pdf free. Here are the links. Internet volunteers are currently preparing a searchable version, which we expect to have online and googled in a few days.

Oregon PR Manual Section 0
Oregon PR Manual Section 1
Oregon PR Manual Section 2
Oregon PR Manual Section 3

Meanwhile, Jeff Mapes of the Oregonian reports that Attorney General Kroger is now considering what action to take against me for illegally redistributing this public records manual. As James Madison said,

"A popular Government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy; or, perhaps both. Knowledge will forever govern ignorance: And a people who mean to be their own Governors, must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives."
Given that this quote is prominently posted on the cover of the very manual which AG John Kroger is trying to keep off the internet, I hold with those who favor farce.

Kroger is not going to take any action against me. His spokesperson Tony Green is soon going to stop answering calls about this. Kroger is never going to do anything to improve access to Oregon's public records, and he is going to blame this on the legislature, claiming he is powerless to act.

I needed to the Public Records Manual to figure out how to get the AG to release a copy of his office's investigation of Special Assistant Attorney General Melinda Grier. While the AG quickly and freely released everything he had about the Adams case, he has only given up heavily redacted parts of the Grier investigation. His Associate AG David Leith is trying to charge $1800 to see even those redacted pages. Ms Grier is not the mayor of Portland, but she is a DOJ Special Assistant Attorney General, and the spouse of DOJ Solicitor General Jerry Lidz. The AG hasn't explained how this legitimately creates a need a redaction when there was none for the Adams case!

9/13/2009 email:
Dear Attorney General Kroger:

In July I tried to obtain a pdf of the 2008 "Oregon Attorney General's Public Records and Meetings Manual" from your office, as part of my still unsuccessful efforts to get a copy of the DOJ's ethics investigation of UO General Counsel and Oregon Assistant AG Melinda Grier.

I was surprised that this manual was not already posted on your public records website. It it seems clear to me that Oregon law regarding public records, and specifically ORS 192.243, requires the DOJ to post this manual online. I was even more surprised when my questions about this and my efforts to get the DOJ to do sol - or at least email me a pdf so that I could post it - were repeatedly ignored by your office.

Eventually I did get the response below, offering to sell me a copy, and warning me ... "it is not to be redistributed without our permission in any format" ... This doesn't seem right to me. This manual describes Oregon's public records law and gives practical advice for state agencies and for people attempting to get public records. The preamble, signed by then AG Hardy Myers, goes on about this for quite a bit. This manual should be posted on the DOJ website where people can google it and use it for its intended purpose.

As you know, previous efforts by the Oregon DOJ to assert its copyright over the Oregon Revised Statutes were ridiculed by the legal community and repudiated by the state legislature in 2008. See http://public.resource.org/oregon.gov/index.html, for example. Attempting to using copyright law to keep a manual on public records off the web - of all things - seems even stranger than this strange episode - especially given your campaign promises to increase the transparency of Oregon's government.

So, I checked a copy of the 2008 PR Manual out of the UO Law Library, scanned it, and I posted the pdf on my official University of Oregon faculty website, at http://harbaugh.uoregon.edu/ORDOJ_PR_Manual and also at http://openuporegon.com. I understand that it is illegal for me to post copyrighted material on the web without permission of the copyright owners. Furthermore, the Oregon PR manual states that copyright of this manual is held by the Oregon DOJ, and as the email below from the DOJ makes clear, the DOJ has explicitly told me not to redistribute the Manual. I am putting it online anyway.

I suppose that you could send me a letter asking me to remove this public records manual from my website, or just request or order UO to do so. Alternatively, you could post the official pdf - which your office already has - on the DOJ's public records website, and make it available to other websites such as http://open-oregon.com. I hope you will do the latter - and also that your office will provide the documents I have requested regarding the Grier investigation without further delay, or unnecessary redactions.

Sincerely,

Bill Harbaugh
Professor of Economics
1285 University of Oregon
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Kron Michael C"
Date: Jul 24, 2009 3:27:11 PDT
To:
Cc: "Green Tony " , "Altenhofen Martin"
Subject: Your request for a PDF of the Public Records Manual.


Good afternoon, Professor Harbaugh.

You requested our Public Records Manual in PDF format. I believe that Tony has told you that, pursuant to our administrative rule, the Manual costs $25. OAR 137-008-0010(4)(d). Upon receipt, you can send a check in that amount to

Publications Section
Oregon Department of Justice
1162 Court St NE
Salem OR 97301-4096

Please enclose a copy of this email with your check.

Our IS people require you to follow the instructions below before we send you the PDF. The State, by and through DOJ, owns copyright to the Manual, and it is not to be redistributed without our permission in any format. This measure is to help protect the copyright. (emphasis added)

If you have any technical questions about the process, please feel free to direct them to Martin Altenhofen, the author of the email below. I would appreciate it if you would copy me on any correspondence with Martin

...

Sincerely,

Michael

29 comments:

Anonymous said...

Post it to wikileaks!

John Doe said...

Keep fighting the good fight and keep your head high when doing so. No shame in doing the right thing and claiming what is rightfully ours.

Anonymous said...

Do you really think you can openly challenge the Government and win???

Anonymous said...

nice job

Anonymous said...

It is everyone's duty to challenge the government and fight for the people. The people that are in government did just that... and won. Don't like what they are doing then challenge it.

Michael Crawford said...

@Anonymous. You can easily win if people Join in with you in the fight. All that's required to lose is to give in and be complicit. Do your part, miror it, and post your link to the mirror here.

Michael Crawford said...

Mirroring here.
http://www.michaelcrawfordportfolio.com/docs/or_doj/
Should be finished uploading in a few.

Anonymous said...

"Do you really think you can openly challenge the Government and win???"

You don't study a lot of history, do you?

Anonymous said...

You are in violation of the copyright law and this whole website is now ILLEGAL. If you are viewing the website, you MUST remove it from all cookies and cache and reboot your computer in to safe mode to do a clean wipe - otherwise the illegal webpage will stay in the cookies!

Anonymous said...

Webpages? In my cookies? It's more likely than you think.

Adam from Portland said...

Looks like both parties in this disagreement can be considered well-intentioned and be considered right about some things and wrong in others.

These documents should be available to everyone. Printing up documents does cost money though.

Maybe the State of Oregon could consider releasing these types of documents on the state website in a downloadable e-book format with a creative commons license?

http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/

The State doesn't have to front money for document costs, and can look at reducing the costs of document printing long term. Spares a few trees along the way, too.

macebobo said...

As a current state employee, I would be happy to help with the searchable transcription, on my own personal time, of course.

Anonymous said...

Somebody else Mirrored it here:
http://www.notatypewriter.com/random/ORDOJ_PR_Manual/

J said...

Go for it Bill. Blogging about it here:
http://10domains.blogspot.com/2009/09/while-in-oregon-manual-on-public.html

J said...

Oh, I just predicted that the AG will blink at 4:55 PM Friday the 18th :-)

Greg said...

Good work, but what a sad fact that you were reduced to this dispute. Good luck and keep fighting the good fight.

Tomas said...

Thank you, Professor Harbaugh!

I have followed with interest the very odd stance of the Oregon AG over copyright of public laws and other publicly paid for documents, and was pleased when the legislature slapped it down.

I can only hope that the shining of light on this further insanity, as you have done here, will once again bring the problem to a logical and rational conclusion.

Best of luck,
Tomas
University Place, WA

Mike said...

Well done, this is an important issue and an admirable stand.

GreyGeek77 said...

When petty, SELF-SERVING, bureaucratic tyrants, like these AG hypocrites, don't honor either the law or their own promises, citizens see the Law only as a thug to be used against them, and something to be ignored at every possible opportunity. So, these AG people, after taking an oath to uphold and defend the laws of their state and our country, urinate on both for their advantages. Cuba, transplanted into the North West!

They've made a mockery and a SHAM out of the Law. SHAME ON THEM!

Anonymous said...

OK, I'm very confused. How can a government copyright a document without that copyright by definition be held by the people under that same government? The copyright would, by inference, be held by the people of Oregon, the state is merely the trustee for the people. How does the AG's office possibly think they can get away with such an action?

Anonymous said...

Hallelujah, and thank you! So glad to see someone stand up against people who hold the mindset they 'own' the law. Good God, no wonder people are holding tea parties.

Anonymous said...

I wish you the best of luck in your fight and agree with you 100%!! Thank you :)

Anonymous said...

You, Sir, have impressively large balls. Keep up the good work.

Anonymous said...

It is good that you are making a positive impact with your illegal actions. Sometimes to get a law changed one must intentionally break it. It is, however, irresponsible of you to use public resources to do so. UO is a public research institution. As a staff member at a public research institution I know that intentionally using my University's resources for illegal activity, even if you are correct in your viewpoint, will result in disciplinary action. It would be better to post your illegal materials on a publicly accessible Web-site outside of UO. That said - I still commend you!

Anonymous said...

He only recently acquired the office, and he is trying to own prose set down before his ascendency. Isn't this a bit like an ag company trying to patent neem, an ancient plant used by Indians for eons? Where will this pattern of behavior end? How devalued can these guys make their own words? In the mouths of politicians, words used to sell themselves have become reliably what they will not do once elected. At least they have not begun to promise not to murder. Maybe we have time left to direct them to reform themselves.

Salon said...

I just saw this via slashdot today and have to add a related topic I wonder about from Texas. When Texas taxpayers are paying 100 percent of the House and Senate media services budgets, why can't taxpayers use Real Media player to download the videos from the Texas Legislature Online site? As in your instance, the government is claiming copyright and that anyone who grabs the stream is stealing. http://salon.glenrose.net/default.asp?view=plink&id=11326

Anonymous said...

I greatly enjoyed your quoting Madison via the manual. Farce indeed.

Anonymous said...

Way to go Professor!

Steve Foerster said...

Adam from Portland suggests that the state release these materials under Creative Commons licenses. The problem with this is that such licenses rely on underlying copyright to work -- you assert all rights to the work, then give some away through the license.

But copyright at all in this case is an affront to common sense. If anything ought to be in the public domain by default, this sort of thing is it. That's why that's the law at the federal level, that anything authored by the federal government is automatically in the public domain. This ought to be the case at all levels of government.

Post a Comment